|
| ||
|
The following transcript is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License. Link to Audio and Episode Info Here
Show Transcript Deconstructing Dinner Kootenay Co-op Radio CJLY Nelson, BC, Canada March 4, 2010 The Slow Down Diet Producer/Host - Jon Steinman Transcript - Kirk Heber/Bev
Christensen Jon Steinman:
And welcome to Deconstructing Dinner, a syndicated weekly radio show and
podcast produced in Nelson, British Columbia at Kootenay Co-op Radio,
CJLY. I'm Jon Steinman. Today
we take a fascinating look into a subject that certainly does not receive the
amount of attention it deserves here on the show, the psychology of
eating. So often we examine how our food
choices impact our environment and our communities, but how about the actual
act of eating? How can a greater sense
of awareness of how we eat influence not only ourselves but everyone and
everything around us? Marc
David will be our featured guest for the next hour. He's the author of our
focus for today - his 2005 book titled, "The Slow Down
Diet - Eating for Pleasure, Energy & Weight Loss". Join
us for the next hour as we explore "A New Way of Seeing Nutrition" - one that
moves from the status-quo whereby nutrition is made up of tangible building
blocks to a new reality which embraces a more holistic approach where the mind
and body are interchangeable. Increase Music and Fade Out Marc David:
To me it ought to be headline news that the major nutritional influence on the
body actually these days is not what you're eating,
it's about, plain and simple, the polarity of stress and relaxation. When you sum-total up all the research that's
done in this area, what you'll find is that digestive physiologists will agree
that approximately 40-60% of your total digestive and assimilative power at any
meal comes from this head phase of digestion - taste, pleasure, aroma,
satisfaction, the visuals; i.e. your awareness of the meal. soundbite What
I will suggest is that the ultimate source of nutritional wisdom is you, the
eater. soundbite JS:
That's Marc David, our featured guest for today's episode, an episode that will
explore a new way of seeing nutrition, and where we'll learn how our body's
ability to digest and metabolize food is not just determined by the scientific
breakdown of the food itself but by our level of relaxation, the quality of our
food, our awareness when we're eating, the rhythms with which we eat throughout
the day, the pleasure we find in our meals, the thought that's put into the
food, the story behind the food and
the sanctity that we bring to the table. Previous
to his most recent book The Slow Down Diet, Marc authored "Nourishing Wisdom - A
Mind-Body Approach to Nutrition and Well-Being". Marc earned his M.A. at Sonoma
State University specializing in the Psychology of Eating. He has trained at
the Harvard Mind Body Medical Institute and the State University of New York's
Upstate Medical School. Marc is now the
founder and director of the Institute for the Psychology of Eating and he also
serves on the editorial staff of Alternative
Therapies in Health and Medicine, a peer-reviewed journal for complementary
and alternative medicine. Marc's
2005 release, The Slow Down Diet,
effectively demonstrates a pretty common sense approach to eating - yet it's one
that challenges so many of the systems of belief that our food system and its
accompanying dieting programs are founded upon. Some
of those beliefs Marc introduces early on in the book as being the most common
nutrition myths. Marc spoke to Deconstructing
Dinner over the phone from his home in Boulder, Colorado, and to help introduce
today's show, Marc outlines Myth #1 - that "The best way to lose weight is to
eat less and exercise more." MD:
It's more than a myth, it's a religion; it gets repeated over and over again in
Western civilization, and the bottom line is, if this approach could work, it
would have worked a long time ago. And
the reality is it doesn't, because obesity or weight gain - let's just even limit
this to North America - continues to be on the rise, continues to be an issue; so
if somebody were to lose weight by eating less and exercising more, they would
have done it already. It's interesting,
the statistics are - and these are updated every year but it always comes out to
be approximately the same stats, which is that anywhere from 96 to 99% of all
humans who lose weight on a weight loss diet gain it back in anywhere from six
months to two years. So that's pretty
profound, and there are numerous reasons why this doesn't work. Some of the basic reasons why eating less and
exercising more doesn't work is that, first and foremost, when we cut calories
away from the body to the degree that we're limiting the actual amount of food
that the body needs, the actual amount of nutrition that the body needs, the
body gets a little concerned. There's
something called the Survival Response: this is an evolutionary adaptation such
that millions of years ago when our distant ape-like ancestors were roaming
around, if their food supply got cut off for any reason, or if they got
marooned on a desert island, the brain quickly perceives that and signals the
body and says, hey, there's no more food around, our food supply is cut off;
better hang on to weight, better hang on to body fat, better not build muscle
because that takes a lot of energy. So
the bottom line is, whenever the body senses this piece called, "Not enough
food", it will go into survival response, and it will literally shift
metabolism to that day. So what happens is, the more people calorie-restrict, the more they send
that signal into their body, "Survival response - Not enough food." JS:
So that's Marc David's Myth #1 - that the best way to lose weight is to eat
less and exercise more. As for Myth #2, another common belief, that the reason
you eat too much is lack of willpower.
According to Marc, that's not true at all, and the reason we overeat is
not because we're weaklings, but because we're physiologically driven to do so
when our meals are deficient in relaxation, time, pleasure, awareness and
high-quality foods. MD:
Most people who are trying to lose weight will assert that my appetite is the
issue, that food is the enemy, and that if I only had more control over my
willpower, if I can just control my bodily instincts, if I can just control
this enemy called my appetite, then I could lose weight. So what happens is, we have a huge amount of
people walking around trying to exert willpower over the body, exert willpower
over appetite, and of course they fail.
I have yet to meet a single person - and I've been in this business for
over 30 years now, counselling, teaching - I have yet to meet a single person who
has said to me, "Yes, I have successfully lost weight and kept it off all these
years because I exert willpower over my appetite and decrease it." And the few that can do that are in a constant state of vigilance and misery and
upset, because it's hard to do. So the
bottom line is this: the brain requires pleasure from food; we are all
programmed at the most primitive level of the brain to seek pleasure and avoid
pain. When you're eating, you're seeking
the pleasure of food; you're avoiding the pain of hunger. When the body doesn't register pleasure from
food because you're eating a low-calorie, nasty cardboard-like diet, the
brain's not smart enough to say, "Hey, you're not getting enough
pleasure". All the brain says is,
"Hungry" - and then you think you have a willpower problem. The brain wants awareness of the meal.
There's something digestive physiologists call the Cephalic Phase
Digestive Response - this is a fancy term for the head phase of digestion,
meaning taste, pleasure, aroma, satisfaction, your visuals of the meal, your awareness of the meal. The brain wants to know what you're eating,
what it tastes like, what it feels like - that's how it gives your body feedback
about, "Oh! Right... that's how much I need", or "Oh!
I need more", or "Oh! Good! I got those vitamins, I
got those macronutrients." So the brain
wants the head phase of digestion to articulate the meal to itself,
to figure out what's going on. If you
eat in a rush, if you're eating on the run, you're getting into your car,
you're stuffing food down your mouth - you're not getting taste, pleasure, aroma,
satisfaction and visuals. And
consequently you could eat a ton of
food - and many people have this experience - they eat a ton of food but they eat
fast, their belly feels full but their mouth feels hungry, and the reason why
the mouth is hungry is because it didn't sense
anything. The food went down so fast,
and once again, the brain's not smart enough to tell you, "Hey pal, you should
have slowed down, you should have tasted your food, you should have nourished yourself, you
should have taken more time." - the brain doesn't know how to say that, the brain
just says, "Hungry!".
So then you're driven to eat
more, from lack of pleasure, from lack of awareness, from lack of time with the meal, from lack of the nuances
that your brain is looking for to distinguish the meal, and then people are
overeating even though they've just eaten a lot and they think it's willpower. But quite the opposite, all they needed to do
is take a deep breath, and slow down and actually do the thing that they're
doing. JS: Now much of what Marc David is introducing
here will be expanded upon in much greater detail as the next hour of the show
unfolds. But let's first move to Marc's Myth #3… that as long as you eat the
right foods in the right amounts, you'll ensure good health and lose weight. As
Marc suggests, what we eat is only half the story. MD:
It's pretty stupendous to me how the whole of nutritional science is founded on
the simple principle that what you eat - the specific food, the chemical make-up
of that food, the nutrient breakdown of that food - that determines nutrition in
the body. So therefore, if we eat the
right foods, the right nutrition, then we will obtain optimum health, optimum metabolism. What I will suggest, and strongly so, is what
you eat is at best half the story of
good nutrition. The other half of the
story is who you are as an eater; meaning what you bring to the table; meaning
there is a very powerful, distinct
and clear mind-body-nutrition connection; meaning your level of stress and
relaxation affects the metabolism of a meal.
Your level of pleasure, your level of awareness affects the metabolism
of a meal. The thoughts you are thinking
will create a certain chemistry, a certain metabolic
milieu within the body. The rhythm at
which you eat - rhythm meaning are you skipping meals, are you starving yourself
for half the day - the speed at which you eat; so all of these things are
factoring in to influence your metabolism, influence your physiology. So the point is you could be eating the
healthiest food in the universe, but if your emotions and your being and your
thoughts and your feelings and your level of stress - if they're negatively
impacting you, then you're not going to be receiving full nutritional value from
that meal. So it's almost like saying
you can get the best gas for your car, but if the car is falling apart and is
no good anymore, it doesn't matter what you put into it; the car has to be
functioning in order to utilize that fuel properly. JS:
So that's Myth #3 - that as long as you eat the right foods
in the right amounts, you'll ensure good health and lose weight. And the
final Myth that Marc introduces in his Slow Down Diet,
is that The experts are your ultimate source of reliable and scientifically
accurate nutrition information. Marc cautions us to not wholeheartedly listen
to the "experts" as he believes we're currently in the "wild-west" of nutrition
expertise. As a result of so many of us gravitating towards the so-called
experts, he believes many of us suffer from a "high-fact" diet. Instead, Marc
believes the best nutritionist is within each of us. MD:
If you walk into the average well-stocked bookstore, you can find at least a
hundred nutrition books. They're each
written by an MD, a PhD, a dietician or a famous nutrition expert, and they all
tell you something different and they all give you scientific proof of why their system is the best.
And this is consistent across the board, anywhere you go - that's a fascinating
phenomenon. Right there it tells me that really we're living in the Wild West
when it comes to nutritional expertise.
I have seen more people walking around in misery suffering from what I
call a "High Fact" diet - way too much information, and ultimately somebody
outside of you: an expert. Yes, perhaps
they can give you some good insight and some good information, simply because
that's their expertise and that's what they're interested in and fanatic about,
but what I will suggest is that the ultimate source of nutritional wisdom is you, the eater. There's something in the body that scientists
call the enteric nervous system; this was described arguably well over a
hundred years ago. The enteric nervous
system is the separate yet interconnected nervous system that enervates your
gut, your digestive tract, meaning your food pipe, your stomach, your small and
large intestines, liver, pancreas, gall bladder. There are as many nerve cells - as many
neurons - in the gut nervous system, in the enteric nervous system, as there are
in your spinal cord. In other words,
what we're saying is that your digestive system is a highly thinking, feeling,
sensing, experiencing part of the body; and there is a huge amount of wisdom
and intelligence and information circulating within the gut. You have probably heard - there's
various estimations - scientists will say, Oh, you only use 2% of your brain, or
10% of the brain or 20% of the brain; whatever it is everybody says something
different. Bottom line is, I would make the same assertion for the gut brain; just as
we only use a small percentage of the head brain, we're only using a small
percentage of the gut brain. Are we
tuning into it? Are we listening to it? It's a tremendous source of feedback that
takes a little training. Just as it
takes you training to go to school - learn how to do math, learn how to read - you
got to train the brain. The gut brain as
well responds to training, to questioning, to listening, to trial-and-error. So that's why I'm saying at the end of the
day, the greatest nutritional expert on the planet when it comes to your body,
is you. JS:
That's Marc David - author of The Slow Down Diet - and our
featured guest on today's episode of Deconstructing Dinner. If you miss any of today's broadcast, it is
archived on-line at deconstructingdinner.ca and posted under the March 4th,
2010 episode. Culturally, when we speak
of nutrition or dieting, the biological process that becomes the focus of the
discussion is… metabolism - the chemical reactions taking place in the body that
break-down our food. Now this, as Marc
suggests, is only one side of the story, and that while the vast majority of
nutrition information would have us believe that metabolism is just an isolated
process within the body, Marc explains that metabolism also takes place outside of the body. MD:
Here's a piece about metabolism: if you actually walked into a room of doctors
and scientists and asked everybody what metabolism was, you would get a
different answer. It's one of those
terms that everybody thinks they know about, but they're really hearing or
saying something different when it comes to that term. If you just look up in any classic freshman
biology or physiology college textbook, the basic definition of metabolism is
simply, the sum-total of all the chemical reactions in your body. Plain and simple; the
sum-total of all the chemical reactions in your body - that's what we call
metabolism. You can get more
specific: we can say there's a metabolism that happens in the liver; there's
the metabolism of specific substances like cholesterol; there's calorie-burning
metabolism - that's what most people hear when they hear metabolism: how well I
burn calories. So, back to the classic
definition: sum-total of all the chemical reactions in the body... Guess
what? Over the last forty years, all the
mind-body science research that has come out has without a doubt placed us in a
whole new realm where it's now understood and proven that the mind affects the
body. Other systems, other cultures - the
Chinese, in India - they've known this thousands of years, but we just caught up
to that. So if the mind and the emotions
are affecting the body, our new and updated definition of metabolism would
simply be the sum-total of all the chemical reactions in the body plus the thoughts, the feelings, the
beliefs; everything that impacts you,
will impact your metabolism. So,
metabolism happening outside the body means you just don't live as an isolated
creature all by yourself on planet Earth; you're surrounded by your friends,
your loved ones, your community, you're in a certain home, you live and breathe
a certain atmosphere, you're in a certain culture, you're in certain
relationships - some are loving, some are work-related, some are supportive - do
they work for you? So everything around
us - it's what you see, the beauty, nature, colour... are you looking around
seeing ugliness - all of that impacts the senses from the outside; it affects us,
it affects metabolism. JS:
Marc David's explanation of how our bodies metabolize food is certainly a new
way of thinking - in light of most nutritional "experts" suggesting that our
physical bodies are isolated from everything else. In the Slow-Down Diet - this
idea is thrown out the window and replaced with a more holistic view of nutrition
by recognizing that our bodies are influenced by our emotions and our
surroundings. In this book Marc introduces what he calls the Eight Universal Metabolizers consisting of Relaxation, Quality, Awareness,
Rhythm, Pleasure, Thought, Story and the Sacred. These Eight Universal Metabolizers became the basis for my conversation with
Marc, and we first deconstructed Relaxation. As Marc explains, when we're not
relaxed, and instead stressed while we eat, our body's digestion turns off. MD:
To me it ought to be headline news that the major nutritional influence on the
body actually these days is not what you're eating,
it's about, plain and simple, the polarity of stress and relaxation. The stress response means the classic Fight
or Flight response; it's a mechanism that we evolved millions of years ago such
that when the lion is chasing you, your heart rate goes up, your blood pressure
goes up, blood is shunted away from your midsection, away from your gut, away
from your digestion where a lot of blood likes to hang out, and blood is rushed
to your arms and legs for quick fighting or fleeing, blood rushes to your head
for quick thinking in a survival situation, and when that lion is chasing you,
your digestive system completely shuts down in a full-blown stress
response. The reason being is you don't
need to be digesting your ice cream cone when the lion is chasing you; you've
got several minutes to survive. So all
of metabolic energy is re-routed into fight or flight responses. This is important because for you and I and
every human walking around, what happens is that stress is actually considered
by science any real threat or any imagined
threat, and the body's response to that threat.
So meaning, there could be a lion chasing you, and you're going to go
into a stress response. If you think a lion is chasing you, you can go
into a stress response; if you think, "Oh my God, I'm not going to make enough
money this week.", you're going to go into a stress
response; if you think, "Oh my God, I'm screwed." - this is going to happen,
that's going to happen - we create some degree of stress physiology. It's a graded response; it's not
all-or-nothing. So there are different degrees
of stress, as each person knows: sometimes we're highly anxious from stress,
other times just a little bit. Now, from
the standpoint of how we are genetically designed, as it turns out, the nervous
system is separated into two essential parts: the sympathetic and the
parasympathetic nervous system. When the
sympathetic nervous system is greatly activated, the stress response is
automatically turned on, and digestion is automatically turned off. So in other words, the same switch in your
brain that turns on stress, turns off digestion. Conversely,
when the parasympathetic nervous system is activated, we create what's called
the relaxation response, and when the relaxation response is fully activated;
digestion, assimilation and day-in, day-out calorie burning is fully
activated. So in other words, the same
switch in your brain that turns on full-blown relaxation, turns on full-blown
healthy digestion, assimilation and day-in, day-out calorie burning. It's stunning, and it sounds
counter-intuitive, because a lot of people think, "Oh, I'm all stressed out,
I'm all hyper, I must be a lean, mean calorie burning machine." And that's probably true for about five or
ten percent of the population, but for the rest of us, when we're in that
degree of stress, we're in some degree of digestive shutdown, which will lead
to excretion of nutrients, meaning you'll literally be eating food, and you'll
be pissing away the vitamins and the minerals.
When we are in some degree of stress response, enzymatic output in the
gut decreases, blood flow decreases, you kill off gut bacteria, you create
symptoms - there's bloating, there's indigestion, there's heartburn; all of these
are simple features of turning off digestion to some degree. So the bottom line is, again, you could eat
the healthiest food in the known universe; if you're not eating it under the
optimum state of digestion and assimilation, which happens to be relaxation,
you aren't getting the full nutritional value from that meal. JS: This is Deconstructing Dinner. We're listening to Marc David - author of The
Slow Down Diet - describing the way in which our body's
ability to digest food is restricted when we eat under stress. No doubt that as our North American culture
has become one of speed and filled with seemingly endless distractions, our
meals and the act of eating have often suffered too - getting sucked into this
daily whirlwind of chaos. While
so-called nutritional wisdom would have us believe that ingesting vitamin A or
carbohydrates or sugars will always be taken up by the body regardless of our
emotional state, Marc suggests otherwise, and presents a seemingly common-sense
explanation that points to this belief as being entirely untrue. And this new approach to eating arrives
alongside what has also become an increasingly popular response to high-speed
living and stress… such as meditation, yoga and the many practices that so many
people are more and more using to slow ourselves down. Of course with meditative practices comes
focus #1…. breathing, and this too, Marc suggests has been missing from the way
we in North America eat. He explains
that our body's hunger for oxygen can also be mistaken for a hunger for
food - yet another explanation as to why fast-paced and stressful living can put
on the pounds. MD:
Well, here's the thing: both oxygen and water are very essential to the
body. When we are low in water, when you
are low in oxygen - the same thing that I am about to say for oxygen holds for
water but way more dramatically for oxygen - the body can go at least four weeks
without food, the body can go for four days without water; you have less than
four minutes without oxygen to survive, and then you have brain death. So oxygen's important. What happens is, you
think you always have oxygen available to you, and generally you do, but indoor
air has less percent oxygen than outdoor air.
Certain indoor spaces have significantly less percent of oxygen, simply
because there's no circulation with the outdoor air, or let's say you have a
building in the city where the windows don't open. Or let's say you're just a
shallow breather, which a lot of people are, or you don't exercise much which
will also lead to shallow breathing. So the bottom line is, when the body says
"Huh I wish I had a little more oxygen. I'm not getting enough. This air is too
stuffy", what will happen is the body will go into a mild stress response: A
mild stress response means mild elevation of insulin, cortisol,
heart rate, blood pressure. You might feel a little antsy and, after your
insulin and cortisol shoots up for a little bit what
is going to happen is there is a little bit of a blood sugar drop. You start to
feel a little weak, ever so slightly. And when you feel a little weak and you
start to feel a little low energy or low mood most people think 'hungry' or most
people think 'need sugar' or 'need caffeine' or 'need food'. So, the brain
isn't smart enough to tell us, "Hey, you need to go outside and take bunch of
deep breaths or go for a walk." The brain is just smart enough to tell us "I'm
missing something." and will mistake the need for lack of oxygen for a need for
food. JS:
Marc David's book, The Slow Down Diet, goes through a
lot of the theory behind slowing down our eating patterns such as what he's
describing here. But the book also provides some easy-to-do exercises to help
us practice some of these ideas. As far as ensuring that we breathe in enough
oxygen while we eat, Marc introduces an exercise that he calls, Check In and Breathe. MD:
So it's a beautiful mind-body technique and it's really simple: When you sit
down to any meal or when you are ready to eat ask yourself, "Am I about to eat
under stress? Answer honestly am I anxious? Am I
rushed? Am I in fear? Am I in anger? Am I in judgement? Am I eating under push,
fear, anxiety or stress? If the answer is 'Yes' very simple, five to ten long, slow,
deep breaths will have a powerful effect on the body. Again, you can change
your digestive and calorie-burning strength in less than a minute. JS:
This is Deconstructing Dinner, a syndicated weekly radio show and podcast,
produced in Nelson, British Columbia, at Kootenay Co-op Radio CJLY. I'm Jon
Steinman. This is a listener supported show that relies on financial
contributions from all of you to help keep us on the air and, while we'd love
to not have to request support on each broadcasts, we are now more than ever,
in need of your financial contributions to help sustain what we do here. We
provide this show free of charge to radio stations and through our podcasts,
with the hope that those of you who value this content that is otherwise not
found in the mainstream media will choose to support a new kind of media such
as what we are offering here at Deconstructing Dinner. One-time donations or
monthly subscriptions can be sent through our web site at deconstructingdinner.ca
and, if you're not online, you can also call 250-352-9600 to learn how to send
a cheque or money order. JS:
On today's episode we've been interacting with author, Marc David, of Bolder,
Colorado. Marc's most recent book, The Slow Down Diet,
published by Healing Arts Press, is the feature of today's show. Marc is also
the author of Nourishing Wisdom: A Mind-Body Approach to Nutrition and Well Being. He
earned his MA at Sonoma State University specializing in The Psychology of Eating.
He has trained at the Harvard Mind-Body Medical Institute and the State
University of New York's Upstate Medical School. Marc is now the founder and
director of the Institute for the Psychology of Eating and he also serves on
the editorial staff of the Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine,
peer-reviewed journal for complementary and alternative medicine. So often here
on the show we spend time in deconstructing the food system and exploring new
models for how we can produce, distribute and access food but, periodically, we
get to the heart of our food connection, like we doing today, the act of eating
itself. With these ideas presented by Marc David as part of his Slow Down Diet,
becoming more aware of how we eat might even be the most important shift we can
make to change our food system from one
of disconnection, such as the one serving North America today, to one of
connection which increasingly has become of interest. Now perhaps part of what has encouraged this
culture of disconnection has been the very narrow way in which nutritionists
believe our food is broken down. Like with much like the way everything around
us is broken down into its scientific building blocks so to has our views on digestion:
Our bodies take in building blocks, our bodies break them down and voila we
function, end of story. Well
this approach ignores the first phase of digestion, the cephalic phase, and Marc
believes not nearly enough attention has been paid to preparing ourselves for
the cephalic phase of digestion which begins in the mind. MD:
So awareness once again is tied into the cephalic phase digestive response. By
the way, the cephalic phase digestive response, the head phase of digestion, where
the sum total of all the research that is done in this area, what you will find
is that digestive physiologists agree that approximately 40 to 60% of your
total digestive and assimilative power at any meal comes from this head space
of digestion; taste, pleasure, aroma, satisfaction, the visuals (i.e. your
awareness of the meal). Have you ever looked at a food and your mouth starts to
water? That's the visuals literally starting to create saliva and salivary
enzymes in your mouth. Have you ever even thought about your favourite food and
your stomach starts to churn? So that's the mind, that's vision, looking at a
food and, all of a sudden, peristalsis begins in the stomach, the muscular
activity that helps churn the food and breaks it down, can literally start. So
we need awareness. Humans are designed differently from other creatures. You
might have heard dieticians or nutrition experts say it takes approximately
twenty minutes for the body to realize it's full, it's true. And all that's
saying is that the body, the human body, likes time when it comes to a meal,
wants to figure things out because this whole process of eating is not so
simple. The body has to figure out so much (i.e. awareness). Now, the more
aware you are and present to the nuances of a meal the more feed back the body
and the brain can give you. Let's say I'm eating my meal and I'm not paying
attention, I'm watching TV and I'm on my computer or doing e-mails and I'm
multi-tasking you don't know how much you're eating really. Your attention is
being drawn elsewhere. Multitasking is considered very sexy in our culture. When
it comes to eating and metabolizing the meal, digesting, assimilating and
calorie-burning it, multi-tasking doesn't work so well. So, literally the brain
will signal a stress response when too much is happening during the eating
process. So literally anything that pulls your awareness intensely away from
the food experience, the brain doesn't like to multi-task so much. There is some
fascinating research on what happens when people are consuming a food and there's distractions in their mind. We can literally measure
mineral absorption decreasing in the small intestine and that will stay that
way sometimes for hours simply because the brain was intensely distracted and
was taking in too many different stimuli at once, which is how many people in
civilized nations tend to eat. JS:
Beyond the cephalic stage of digestion is another important level of brain
activity but not in our heads, in our bellies. As introduced earlier in the
show what is referred to in The Slow Down Diet as The Brain in Our Bellies and Marc explains this process by using a
common saying, 'gut feeling' a saying that we use often here in North America
but never quite break it down to understand where it comes from. Marc uses a
global perspective across cultures to stress the importance of our 'gut
feelings'. MD:
Gut Feelings bring us back to the brain in the belly, the enteric nervous
system. Given that there are over one hundred million neurons in the enteric
nervous system, as many as there are in the spinal cord, it means there is a
huge amount of intelligence that's residing in the gut. So this is why we are
able to say, "You know, I had a gut feeling about that guy." You do not say, "I
had an elbow feeling or a kidney feeling or a liver feeling." Because we just don't have such powerful feelings wired into the
nervous system of the elbow. Consequently there are cultures around the
globe when Americans, let's say, or Canadians want to say, "I know something. I
know this," we'll point to our head as the center of knowing. So if I as an
American say, "I know this" I'll point to my head and say, "I know." When someone
from Japan says, "I know" they point to their mid-section. They point to what
the Japanese call the Hara
or the Dantian, which is the center
point of the body located a little bit below the belly button. That's where
they consider the center of intelligence. This is a culture that will literally
think from it's gut. They highly value gut feelings.
There are other places or religions that highly value the heart centre . The heart also has its own very interesting
separate, yet interconnected nervous system and specialized nervous tissue.
There are people who will tell you, "Yeah, I think from here" and they point to
their heart. Once again are we accessing the gut instincts, the gut feelings, the gut thoughts when it comes to "What should I eat today?
What should I eat at this meal? What is my body calling for? You know,
sometimes you could refer to your head brain and say, "Yeah, you know I ate
this yesterday so maybe I'll eat it today." But what would it be like to just
take a deep breath and breathe into the body and call upon the gut and call
upon the gut wisdom and access that part of your built-in innate genetically
designed intelligence. Again it's a process, it's a learning experience, it's trial and error, its development. But it's very
powerful and for many people it's very liberating to develop that kind of
relationship with their body because every body is unique, quite literally.
There are, to my mind, as many different legitimate nutritional systems as
there are people on the planet. We could agree there are certain foods that are
more toxic and more poisonous and there are certain foods that are really great
for you. But the bottom line is there could be a food that is so great and so
wonderful and yet certain people can't eat a strawberry, or certain people
can't eat a peanut, or can't eat gluten, or can't drink milk, or can't eat soy
or corn, or whatever it is, every body is so unique. And I don't think we
realize how unique we actually are, because we are so inundated with
information about what you should and shouldn't eat. What does the body really
say? That's a whole different conversation. JS:
Marc David. We have been gradually working our way through the eight universal metabolizers that author Marc David introduces in his book,
The Slow Down Diet, and one of those metabolisers that we haven't spoken of yet
is rhythm. What Marc is referring to is the rhythm with which we eat every day
which he describes in the book as a key determinant of our body's ability to
metabolize food. MD:
There is a very little known field of nutrition called Biocircadian
Nutrition, it's mostly relegated to the field of
research. Biocircadian Nutrition essentially refers
to the fact that the way the human body is designed to digest and assimilate
and calorie burn there's a rhythm to it, a natural rhythm,
that will apply for most human bodies across the globe. So in other words
when you measure, let's say calorie burning metabolism, when you measure the
strength of digestion you will find that for most human beings the body is
designed to most strongly digest and calorie-burn at approximately high noon,
mid-day between about twelve to one-thirtyish,
when the sun is highest in the sky. In fact little-known piece of
scientific research which I find so compelling, your metabolism is actually at
its strongest the moment the sun is highest in the sky. So we're creatures that
are attuned to the sun and to some interesting rhythms. So the bottom line is this,
you are designed to eat technically your biggest meal at the lunch meal. You
have somewhat of a decent digestive power in the morning. Your digestive power
is a little stronger compared to the morning at dinner time; five- six- seven
o'clock. Digestive metabolism and calorie-burning metabolism starts to decrease
right at around eight- nine- o'clock. Now you can alter these things depending
on sleeping rhythm, depending on your exercise rhythm. But the bottom line is,
at three-four-five in the morning that's your least calorie-burning hours. So
this is why eons ago, or centuries ago I should say, the Japanese Sumo Wrestlers
how did they gain all that weight? They didn't have Ben and Jerry's Ice-Cream. They didn't have cake. The way they gained
all that weight just simply eating rice, seaweed and fish was, yes they would
eat more food, but they would eat it at night. They would literally wake
themselves up at night and have a big meal taking advantage of the fact that
metabolism is slowest at that point. So, how this becomes practical, is that
there are so many people out there who are looking to lose weight. And so many
people who are looking to lose weight what they do is they are going to try to
starve themselves and try to not have breakfast and try to not have lunch and
usually about two- or three-o'clock, four at the latest, those people are
starving and they are ravenous and they may have a big snack and they may have
a huge dinner and then they have a big after-dinner snack and essentially they
are a sumo diet. They are loading up all their calories in the latter third of
the day not in the first half of the day which is when your body is naturally
designed to break things down. So, in the United States and Canada most people
their biggest meal tends to be dinner. Lunch is often just quick and small
because they got through work. You go to different European countries - you go
to Italy, you go to France - where people aren't complaining about their weight
like we complain here in North America, they're eating their biggest meal at
mid-day. So those cultures recognize, they are more
tuned into the natural rhythms of the body. JS:
This is Deconstructing Dinner. If you've missed any of today's episode it is archived
online a deconstructingdinner.ca and posted under the March 4th 2010
broadcast. More information on today's topic is also found there including
information on how to subscribe to our weekly podcast. As we enter into the last quarter of today's show
we arrive at another of the eight universal metabolizers
outlined as part of The Slow Down Diet, pleasure. It's a component of our meals
that might seem like a given. But, when observing the way in which our food
system has sought to mimic real food with artificial ingredients and processes,
our North American culture for one, perhaps lost touch with how much pleasure
we can actually find from food. As Marc David explains, pleasure is a key part
of our body's ability to metabolize food and our tendency to crave dessert at
the end of a meal is a sign of our digestive systems need for pleasure. MD:
When it comes to pleasure all you have to do is go back to probably one of the
first principles that you might have learned when you were ten- eleven- twelve-
thirteen-years old in school which is that all organisms on the planet; whether
it's an amoeba, whether it's a lizard, a dog or a human, we are all designed at
the most primitive level of the nervous system to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
That's how we're built. People think pleasure is bad and we have all these
lines to sell food like, "Oh, it sinfully good." So we have equated pleasure
with bad and the truth is the body needs it, it's designed for it in a powerful
way. We have four kinds of taste buds on the tongue; sweet, salty, sour and
bitter. We have more sweet taste buds than any other kind. One of the reasons
they are there, very simply, is to give you pleasure. It feels good. Pleasure
is irreducible, it just is. And what happens is pleasure has a powerful
metabolic effect within the body. It is part of metabolism. It functions within
all different aspects of how we move in the world, how we digest and how we assimilate,
how we create energy, how we create mood. So, on the one hand pleasure will
catalyze a relaxation response. I will say that again: Pleasure catalyzes a
relaxation response. Meaning, you have a hard day at work, you come home and
your wife says, "Okay, honey let me give you a shoulder rub. She gives you a
shoulder rub, you're all stressed out and all of a sudden "Oh, thank you. I
feel so good." (i.e. you got some pleasure and
literally catalyzed a nervous system change in your body which then affected
you powerfully, relaxed you.) Now remember
the optimum state of digestion and assimilation is relaxation. So anything that
moves us into relaxation response, by definition, increases metabolic
efficiency and increases your ability to break down food, extract the
nutrients, excrete it and calorie burn the rest. So,
when you're getting pleasure from your meal you're literally signalling the
body to relax. If you were eating food, if I give you a meal, and it had all
your least favourite foods, and it had the kind of foods that would make you
run away, you would be sitting there trying to eat a meal you would be all
stressed out and it would be a horrible experience for you, you wouldn't digest
the meal, your stomach would be upset, you wouldn't be happy. If I gave you a meal that worked for you. "Yes, that feels
good!" Your digestion is going to be humming which is why there are foods that
might not be the kind of foods you want to eat every day - the cake, the
cookies, the ice-cream - might not be the kind of food that you make the staple
food in your diet. But can we really eliminate them? Can we really call them bad
because some of those foods, which we traditionally eat in small quantities
(i.e. the dessert) it's enough to stimulate pleasure,
to stimulate happiness, to stimulate relaxation response, and dessert
traditionally comes at the end of a meal, in other words you're using an
intense hit of pleasure to catalyze digestion even more. So there's a wisdom to
it that's been built in over hundreds of years of culture. So what I'm saying
is, pleasure is actually essential to the nutritive
process. Anyone that ever tries to eliminate that from the diet is generally,
in some version, of misery. JS:
Marc David. As we near the end of the show we can focus on a section of Marc's
book that we here at Deconstructing Dinner found to be one of the most
interesting ideas that ties together much of what has been shared on the show
today. We have been discussing the many psychological states that contribute to
our body's digestion such as our level of relaxation and stress, our heightened
or decreased awareness of our meal, whether our food carries a lot of pleasure
or very little, and the rhythm with which we eat throughout the day as just
some of the examples. And how we bring some of these to the table when we eat
depends on who is at the table. While we might view ourselves as one distinct
personality, most of us to varying degrees maintain multiple personalities, depending
on our moods, who we're around, what role we're
playing at that moment and all of this as described in The Slow Down Diet can
play a role in our body's ability to digest food. To explain this unique
perspective here again is Marc David. MD:
According to most psychological systems, you are you and I am me and and there's one guy inside you called you and there's one
guy inside me called me. What's fascinating is that behind the line in
psychological research there's a lot of interest in what we traditionally call
multiple personality disorders because as it turns out those who have clinical
multiple personalities actually might be the more accurate and workable model
for who we as humans actually are. In other words, you're not a person you're
crowd of people, a crowd of people meaning who's inside me? Well there's me. I'm a brother. I'm a father. I'm a husband. I'm
a friend. I can be a jerk. I can be a teacher. I can be a saint sometimes. I
can be a rebellious teenager. So there's all these people who populate our
inner world and depending on who you're with and what your role is at the
moment, if you go home to your parent's house you're in a different role, if
you go to work and you're managing people you're in a different role. Well,
when you look at people with multiple personalities science discovered, quite a
long time ago, that when you actually start to look at physiologic measures of
multiple personality patients every personality has a different physiology. So somebody
with ten different personalities when you measure heart rate, blood pressure,
galvanic skin response, hormone levels within those different personalities
they change from personality to personality and dramatically so. In some of the
most famous incidences there are recorded experiences where a multiple
personality patient would be an insulin-dependent diabetic but only in one
personality. Switch to another personality, she's fine. Another patient will be
highly allergic to citrus fruits such that, eat a citrus fruit, get hives on
your back but in one personality. And literally switch to another personality
and before the researcher's eyes the hives start to disappear. So what's useful
to me here, is that if I take that model and extend it to the average normal
health human being walking the street who are you when you eat, what
personality is coming to the table? For so many people they're in the dieting
personality, they're in the personality called 'I'm No Good', 'I'm Too Fat',
'I'm Not Thin Enough' 'I'm Unlovable' and that's the personality, the Unlovable
Victim. Well guess what? When you're in that you're in that personality you're
in fear, you're in anxiety and you are in stress. Which means
you're in stress response. Which means you're creating
stress chemistry. Which means you're decreasing your body's ability to
digest, assimilate and calorie burn a meal so, strangely enough, that
personality creates the very physiology that will tell the body to hang on to
weight and what that person is trying to do is to get it off. So, sometimes the
person who is eating is the rebellious teenager in us. "I can just eat anything
I want, I'm going to die anyway." Which is true but
who are you inviting to the head of the table? So with so many clients and
students over the years I'll say to, let's say women, "What would it be like to
invoke the Queen in you, the woman in you, the wise woman in you at the head of
the table as opposed to the scared little girl who just wants to be skinny?" Or
for men, "What would it be like to invoke the King in you, to eat with dignity,
to eat with presence not just be eating as the teenager?" Because we will often
go into a very distinct persona within ourselves when we eat and not even know
it. So it's a different level of awareness to tune in and say, "Who's present? Who's eating?" And we have the ability, literally, to choose who we want to put front and
center at the head of the table, which will create a different physiology. JS:
Author Marc David of Bolder, Colorado. Marc is the author of The Slow Down Diet and he is the founder and director of The
Institute for the Psychology of Eating. You can learn more about Marc by
visiting his web site at marcdavid.com and links to more information on today's
topic and links to similar topics that we've aired over the past four plus
years are found on the Deconstructing Dinner web site at
deconstructingdinner.ca. Today's show is found under the March 4th
2010 broadcast. And to close out the show one last clip from my conversation
with Marc, one that expands upon our ability to sense food. Just as Deconstructing
Dinner has sought to encourage and foster a greater culture of connection with
our food, Marc suggests our connection to our food can go well beyond the
abilities of our five senses. Using Albert Einstein's e=mc2 as an
example, Marc explains how we might, very well, be capable of experience more
intangible energy from the food we eat. MD: It's funny because even if someone knows
nothing about science or little about science, somehow Einstein has become
quite famous and his equation e=mc2 has become famous. All e=mc2
means is that energy and matter are interchangeable, they are the same thing.
So the hard stuff - your floor, your walls, your body, matter - is
interchangeable with energy, that can all be turned to
energy. It could all disappear. You could burn it.
Where does it go? It's converted to unseen energy. When you eat food at some
point the hamburger that you put in your body, yeah there's pieces of it that get
excreted out from your body, and there's pieces of it that you're going to take
that hamburger and use it as, let's say, some building blocks for some muscle
tissue or some of the fat will go into the building blocks of your cell walls.
But there's x-amount of that that hamburger goes into energy, it goes into
calorie burning, and it literally becomes non-matter, it becomes electricity,
if you will. It just disappears into
light. So really, all this is pointing to is that we tend to look at the value
of a food as in the chemical content alone, the vitamin and mineral content
alone, and we're saying, "Well, if we can measure the value of the food, by the
chemistry of it, the nutrients, then that determines the value." To me this is
no different than saying the value of a great work of art comes from analyzing
the pigments of the paint. No, there's a subtle quality to the food, there's
places in the energy realm that we just can't measure. And just because we
can't see it and just because we can't measure it doesn't mean that it doesn't
exist. There was a time when we didn't
know how to measure or see oxygen, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There
was a time when we couldn't see parasites and bacteria, that doesn't mean they
didn't exist. There's a quality to food that is subtle. Matter is imbued with
energy, matter has memory, your body has memory, DNA
is memory. It's literally physical, chemical memory built into your system. It
remembers your mother, remembers your father, it puts those two together, it creates you. So we know matter has memory. Food has
memory, it's matter. Food will record everything
that's gone into it. So not only in the DNA but who grew it who cooked it, how
was it grown, how was it cooked? Was the food created with high intentions? Was
it created with low intentions? To me everything that we put into a creation
whether you're making a work of art, whether you're building a table, whether
you're raising a child, everything that we put into that is registered in that
entity in that substance in that creature as memory. So what I'm say is what
you put into the food is what we get out of the food. So if we are putting
unconsciousness into the food, it we're putting greed into the food, if we're putting
anger into the food, if we're putting, "I just want to create the cheapest
piece of food and sell it for the most amount of money," that's what we're
getting. Increase music and fadeout JS:
And
that was this week's edition of Deconstructing Dinner, produced and recorded at
Nelson, British Columbia's Kootenay Co-op Radio. I've been your host Jon
Steinman. I thank my technical assistant John Ryan. The theme music for
Deconstructing Dinner is courtesy of Nelson-area resident Adham
Shaikh. This
radio program is provided free of charge to campus/community radio stations
across the country, and relies on the financial support from you the listener. Support for the program can be donated
through our web site at deconstructingdinner.ca or by dialing
250-352-9600.
|